Los Angeles women should think twice before calling the police for help. From police response to internal domestic violence cases (Upon release, Bob Mullally's strong voice only got stronger) to those in the "care" field.

LA DAs have a long history of not prosecuting DV cases. Especially their own.

And what can you say about 21 year veteran Sheriff's Deputy Silvio Sam Filipovich? Only, Bring back the Psych Evals and public trust.

Unfortunately for the public, LA prosecutor only want slam dunks. Generally, people don't realize salaries and promotions are based on conviction rates, not losses.

Media coverage is poor. Media fails to remind readers and viewers it is not up to the Victim to make the case. It's the Prosecutor's job to work hard and then trust the jury process, which DAs frequently will not do.

Then consider this article titled, Is Justice For Sale in LA?

But it does explain why Chris Brown is playing the odds. and in LA the odds are good.

Although LA has almost too many problems to list, we'll try.

LA's institutional abuse continues with State boards failing to monitor Peter Ruthenbeck, former President of the California Association of Licensed Educational Psychologists.

Although criminal charges pending against Ruthenbeck; taxpayers must be wondering why they're financing monitor-free, state psychology boards and officials at district schools.

As judges claim, "the Best interest of the child" as the Mantra for Family Court; any tutorial of family court must include the reality.

The reality is Guardian Ad Litems can and, in some cases will, make sure custody is awarded to a convicted child abuser if they want to. Such is the case with Guardian Ad Litem Deborah Jean Manning who ignored Brian Miller violating the terms of supervised visitation, including after inappropriate physical contact, documented by a slew of case workers and hospital personnel.

As such FamilyLawCourts.com explains why children would be better protected if yellow, police tape, warning, "Crime Scene - - Do Not Enter" was taped across court room doors of "family" courts across the nation.

This Los Angeles case features Brian Miller, son of Rep Gary Miller, named by the "Beyond Delay" website as one of twenty-two most corrupt congressmen currently "serving" the people of the 42nd District.

We're not questioning whether Rep. Miller strong-armed law enforcement. He did with five police detectives from the Major Crimes Unit arriving at the home of maternal grandparent Jude Lopez, at noon. Rep. Miller also drove up.

Three more detectives arrived at six o'clock. Two more detectives arrived at 9 o'clock and still two more at 11:00P.M.

On Tuesday, a high tech detective arrived.

The very first abuse of power, is causing the file to be sealed. This occurred. Therefore the many experts making damaging statements about the father; is now sealed.

But consider that in August, 2007 - the mother had sole legal custody and barely two months later, she doesn't.

With what we've learned about the case; the police should be pursuing separate charges towards the father.

And the twist in this case also lies with Judge Marjorie Steinberg. Steinberg appears readily inclined to discount Every documented, negative report detailing the father's ongoing conduct; ranging from his earlier guilty plea to child endangerment, child abuse, and battery on their mother; to follow up reports detailing his sexual problems towards children and hostility towards grown females, as well as polygraphs of both parents.

Evidence is overwhelmingly in support of mother which is probably why Judge Michael Linfield awarded her sole legal custody.
That same evidence has been overwhelmingly ignored by Judge Steinberg.

Typically what happens when both children and parents reports crimes is the protective parents is charged with "parental alienation." In this manner, the actual behaviors of the offending parent, are never examined.

In the case of Judge Steinberg ignoring documentation after documentation of physical abuse, in a perfect world CPS would intervene against the Judge Steinberg and Deborah Manning.

Manning for putting her young charges at risk, Judge Steinberg for ensuring they would be put in harms way. In a just world, both would be charged as an accessories. The broad discretion allowed by judges does not include ignoring stacks of reports and guilty pleas.

Would we ever hire Deborah Manning?
Not in a million years.
We value the emotional, mental and physical safety of our children.

In the custody case of Michael Jackson, what Family Court Judge would sign off on the completely restrictive agreement executed by Michael Jackson's lawyers against Deborah Rowe, "as the best interests of the children?"

And why does the media not identify that judge?

Finances remain the not-so-subtle proof whoever has the most money wins.

Children become the prize.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site Navigation: